This isn't a complete rewrite of the contingencies section of Writing Freeform Larps, but further thoughts on them following discussions on the ukfreeforms mailing list. When I get to a second edition, I will review the section on contingencies in light of this post.
The background to the discussion was that I was writing Aurora Horizon, a game set aboard a spaceship where the crew awakens from cryosleep with somes of their memory missing. The first part of the game would be about them dealing with that.
I wasn't sure how to approach the idea, so I started a discussion on the mailing list.
Player preferences (ie, everyone is different)
It quickly became clear that some players prefer the surprise of in-game reveals, while others prefer to know everything in advance, as it allows them to think about how to play the character and integrate the information into their roleplay.
So while some may enjoy the rollercoaster of unexpected twists, others prefer to know the key points ahead of time.
(And me? I don’t know – I’ve not done either. I suspect it depends on the game. I’ve written about it before on my blog, though.)
Should I ever create a second edition of Writing Freeform Larps, I will update the section on contingency envelopes to reflect this.
Contingencies
Contingency envelopes can be triggered by in-game events, by other players, or by time. (Or they may simply be handouts from the GM.)
Contingencies are a popular way of dealing with hidden information – I’ve used them.
For many players, opening a contingency is great – it’s like a small reward, and it’s exciting to find out what’s inside.
However, contingencies aren’t perfect:
- Sometimes, the contingency is a disappointment and doesn’t contain anything new.
- Reading lengthy information mid-game can be overwhelming for players with dyslexia or those for whom English is a second language.
- Interrupting roleplay to read an envelope can disrupt the flow of the game.
- Players might forget triggers and miss vital information. (I’ve certainly done this! Backup triggers may help here.)
- If other characters reveal information before a player opens their envelope, it can be deflating.
Full disclosure
Providing all information upfront means putting all of the information in the character sheet in advance and explaining (through GM notes) how I imagine the character might be played.
This approach:
- Allows players to plan their roleplay.
- Enables players to foreshadow and create a richer character experience.
- Reduces the burden on GMs.
- Allows players to role-play their character’s surprise when appropriate.
However, not all players like this approach – especially those who enjoy being surprised by twists and turns.
I often use a full-disclosure approach for minor bits of information. So rather than use a contingency, I will often now write: “GM note: If you see item 25 (a painting), you recognise it as one that your grandfather painted and used to hang in your study. What is it doing here?”
I’ve yet to see a player abuse this, and it simplifies packing character envelopes.
Hybrid approaches
Of course, it is possible to combine both methods.
Players who like full disclosure can open their contingencies in advance. (The opposite isn’t quite so easy, of course.)
I may decide to have some parts of the game as full-disclosure but also have some contingencies for what I think are key secrets. (And if I really don’t want players to open them in advance, I could do them as GM handouts.)
Memory loss specifics
Amnesiac characters require a few special considerations.
- Reveals should enhance a player’s experience, not detract from it. A contingency that completely changes a character’s nature should have some foreshadowing so it doesn’t feel too jarring.
- It’s worth thinking about how the reveal is staged – giving it space and making it memorable. As a result, I am considering adding a psychologist/therapist character who can be the focus for recovering memories to give it a sense of importance.
- Players should know that their character has lost their memory. Otherwise, they may assume that a lack of information indicates a badly written game. (We’ve all been there!)
- Given the nature of memory loss, a single contingency could include too much information for a player to read and absorb while actively playing. So if possible, time “heavy” contingencies to suit any breaks.
- Some players may not like receiving lots of new information during the game – something to consider as part of casting.
Aurora Horizon
In the end, for those characters in Aurora Horizon who were having memory problems, I wrote the first page of their character sheet (including some goals) from the perspective of having just woken up from cryosleep.
After that, I put the rest of their character information (including more goals) and told them that it was up to them how they wanted to play recovering their memories. If they were enjoying playing an amnesiac, then they could do that for as long as they wanted. If they didn't, then they could get their memories back sooner.
(And for a few specific memories, I used contingency envelopes.)
From what I could tell, the approach seemed to work. Letting the players decide is often best!
